Coherent Breathing

by

Coherent breathing is a slow, steady breathing practice most often taught at around 5-6 breaths per minute, with a smooth, continuous rhythm and (commonly) equal inhale and exhale. It’s closely related to resonance frequency breathing used in HRV biofeedback, where the breathing rate is tuned to the pace that produces the strongest cardiorespiratory “resonance” response.​

Coherent breathing basics

Coherent breathing is typically coached as a gentle nasal breath with an even cadence (no breath holds) and a 1:1 inhale-to-exhale ratio. Many programs set a target of about 5 breaths per minute (e.g., coherent breathing at 5 breaths/min) or a nearby pace, such as ~5.5 breaths/min, depending on the protocol and the person. In the Breath-Body-Mind approach, coherent breathing is explicitly taught as breathing in and out for equal counts, usually aiming for about five breaths per minute.​

Key characteristics (what makes it “coherent” in practice):

  • Slow pace: commonly ~5-6 breaths/min (roughly 10-12 seconds per full breath cycle).​
  • Smoothness: soft, quiet breathing that does not feel like “big gulps of air.”​
  • Even timing: inhale and exhale matched (at least as a default starting point).​

How it may work (mechanisms)

Slow-paced breathing is consistently discussed as a way to influence autonomic function by strengthening respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA),  the normal pattern where heart rate tends to rise during inhalation and fall during exhalation. HRV-biofeedback models propose that when breathing is paced near an individual’s resonance frequency (often close to ~0.1 Hz, about 6 breaths/min), oscillations in heart rate and blood pressure can become larger due to interaction with baroreflex regulation of blood pressure. Practical HRV biofeedback guidance describes resonance-frequency breathing as a method to maximize these oscillations and thereby increase short-term HRV indices during practice sessions.​

Important nuance: resonance frequency is individual and may not be perfectly stable over time. A study on stability reported that the resonance frequency changed between sessions for a majority of participants, suggesting it can vary rather than being a fixed, lifelong number.​

What the research actually supports (and what it doesn’t)

Slow breathing research (in general) supports meaningful short-term physiological effects, especially on HRV and RSA, but psychological outcomes are more variable and depend strongly on study design and control conditions. A systematic review on slow breathing reports psycho-physiological correlates, including autonomic changes (HRV/RSA) and subjective relaxation, and notes heterogeneity across studies.​

The best current “reality check” for mental-health claims

The largest placebo-controlled coherent-breathing trial to date randomized 400 participants to coherent breathing at ~5.5 breaths/min or an attention-placebo-paced breathing condition at 12 breaths/min, practiced for ~10 minutes/day for 4 weeks. Both groups were paced with equal inhalation/exhalation ratios, and participants were blinded to allocation. The study found no measurable advantage of coherent breathing over the placebo condition for stress (primary outcome) and also no differences for anxiety, depression, or well-being.​

Practical takeaway: Coherent breathing may still be useful as a skills-based regulation practice and for acute physiology (like HRV changes during sessions), but it should not be marketed as guaranteed superior to other paced breathing patterns for long-term mental-health outcomes.​

Evidence from multi-component programs

Some clinical studies combine coherent breathing with other interventions (for example, Iyengar yoga plus coherent breathing at 5 breaths per minute), making it hard to attribute benefits to breathing alone. For example, a randomized dosing study in major depressive disorder used Iyengar yoga plus coherent breathing (five breaths/min) and reported reductions in depressive symptoms over 12 weeks, but the breathing component was not isolated as a standalone treatment.​

How to practice coherent breathing (practical protocol)

A high-quality coherent breathing session prioritizes comfort, steadiness, and ease especially at the start. The RCT protocol provides a realistic “minimum effective dose” template: ~10 minutes/day with paced guidance.​

Step-by-step (10 minutes)

  1. Setup
    Sit upright or lie down comfortably and relax the jaw/face to reduce effortful breathing. If possible, breathe through the nose to keep the breath softer and less prone to overbreathing.​
  2. Choose a starting pace
    Two common starting options that match research and teaching norms are:
  • 5 seconds in / 5 seconds out (6 breaths/min).​
  • ~5.5 seconds in / ~5.5 seconds out (~5.5 breaths/min), matching the large RCT’s coherent breathing pace.​
  1. Keep the breath “light”
    If the breath becomes effortful, reduce depth rather than speeding up immediately; HRV-biofeedback guidance warns that overly deep breathing can lead to discomfort and “overbreathing” sensations in some people.​
  2. Maintain continuity
    Avoid breath holds and aim for a smooth transition between inhale and exhale, as coherent breathing is commonly coached as continuous rhythmic breathing.​
  3. Close the session
    After ~10 minutes, let the breath return to a natural rhythm before standing up, especially if any lightheadedness appears.​

Optional modification: longer exhale (use cautiously)

Some HRV biofeedback guidance notes that a longer exhalation is recommended in certain resonance-frequency assessments and cites literature suggesting that a longer exhale may increase RSA/cardiac vagal tone, while also noting that some studies find no differences between 1:1 and 1:2 ratios on common HRV metrics. If equal timing feels activating, a gentle experiment is 4 seconds in / 6 seconds out while keeping the breath small and comfortable.​

Personalizing: coherent vs resonance-frequency breathing

Resonance frequency assessment protocols typically test multiple breathing rates (often spanning roughly 4.5-6.5 breaths/min in adults) to identify the rate that produces the strongest oscillatory response. Because the resonance frequency may shift, it may be more practical to choose a “working range” (e.g., 5-6 breaths/min) that feels stable, comfortable, and repeatable rather than chasing a single exact number.​

Safety, troubleshooting, and “who should be careful.”

Common troubleshooting signals

If tingling, dizziness, agitation, or air hunger appear, the most common fix is to reduce the size/volume of the breath and return to a natural pace briefly, because HRV-biofeedback guidance describes that some people may inadvertently overbreathe when trying slow-paced breathing. If the practice increases anxiety consistently, switching to a slightly faster paced pattern (or shorter sessions) can be a reasonable adjustment, especially given the RCT finding that a faster paced control condition (12 breaths/min) performed similarly on mental-health outcomes.​

Medical cautions (do not ignore)

HRV-biofeedback clinical guidance discusses contraindications/precautions for resonance frequency breathing training, including caution in certain medical situations (e.g., pacemaker-driven rhythm) and contexts where slowed breathing may be inappropriate without clinician oversight. In research-grade coherent breathing protocols, participants with relevant medical issues (e.g., respiratory/cardiovascular problems or breathlessness) were excluded, which supports being careful about applying one-size-fits-all breathing prescriptions.​

Sources (further reading)